ABSTRACT
Background/Aims@#Cholangiocarcinoma frequently recurs even after curative resection. Expression levels of proteins such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Snail, epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) examined by immunohistochemistry have been studied as potential prognostic factors for cholangiocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate significant factors affecting the prognosis of resectable cholangiocarcinoma. @*Methods@#Ninety-one patients who underwent surgical resection at Samsung Medical Center for cholangiocarcinoma from 1995 to 2013 were included in this study. Expression levels of Ecadherin, Snail, IL-6, membranous EGFR, and cytoplasmic EGFR were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray blocks made from surgical specimens. @*Results@#Patients with high levels of membranous EGFR in tissue microarrays had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS): high membranous EGFR (score 0–2) 38.0 months versus low membranous EGFR (score 3) 14.4 months (p=0.008) and high membranous EGFR (score 0–2) 23.2 months versus low membranous EGFR (score 3) 6.1 months (p=0.004), respectively. On the other hand, E-cadherin, Snail, cytoplasmic EGFR, and IL-6 did not show significant association with OS or DFS. Patients with distant metastasis had significantly higher IL-6 levels than those with locoregional recurrence (p=0.01). @*Conclusions@#This study showed that overexpression of membranous EGFR was significantly associated with shorter OS and DFS in surgically resected bile duct cancer patients. In addition, higher IL-6 expression was a predictive marker for recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma patients with distant organ metastasis after surgical resection.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The dosimetric advantages of multiple non-coplanar stationary fields for stereotactic radiotherapy or adiosurgery (SRT/S) are well known. However, this technique is not widely used due to the logistical problems associated with producing and testing customized collimators. We report our experience of SRT/S using multiple non-coplanar stationary fields (conformal SRT/ S). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1997 and February 2002, we performed frameless SRT/S in 63 patients. We chose conformal SRT/S when the tumor was of a very irregular shape or larger than 4 cm. We obtained three pieces of information: 1) the couch translations required to bring the target point to the isocenter, 2) the distance between the stereotaxic markers in the CT study, and the distance between the markers determined from orthogonal beam films, taken in the anterior- posterior and lateral directions, and 3) the rotational movement of the head position between the CT study and actual treatment position. We evaluated two kinds of data: 1) the precision of the isocenter setup, and 2) the reproducibility of the head position in the a) translational and b) rotational components. RESULTS: Twenty-six of the 63 patients receiving stereotactic treatment received conformal SRT/S. The precision of the isocenter setup for the conformal SRT/S was x=-0.03+/-0.26 mm, y=0.19+/-0.25 mm and z=-0.20+/-0.27 mm. The reproducibilities of the head position with the conformal SRT/S were 0.5 mm and less than 1degrees C, for the translational and rotational components, in any plane. CONCLUSION: We were able to apply conformal stereotactic irradiation, which has a dosimetric advantage, to irregularly shaped intracranial tumors, with precision and reproducibility of head position for the isocenter setup nearly equivalent to that of frame-based SRS or multiple-arc SRT/S.
Subject(s)
Humans , Head , Radiotherapy , TranslationsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We analyzed setup errors induced by using air-vacuum cushion as immobilization device in patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We had treated the twenty patients with rectal cancer by 6 MV, 10 MVx-ray from Aug. 1998 to Aug. 1999 at Chungnam National University Hospital. All patients were treated at prone position. They were separated to two groups, control group, 10 patients using styrofoam, and test group, 10 patients using styrofoam and air-vacuum cushion. We measured errors of posterior field forx, y axis and lateral field for z, y axis with simulation film and EPID image using a matching technique. RESULTS: In control group, the mean displacement values of pelvic bone landmark forx axis and y axis were 0.02 mm. 0.78 mm, respectively and the standard deviations of systematic error were 2.13 mm, 2.40 mm, respectively and the standard deviation of random error were 1.46 mm. 1.51 mm, respectively. In test group, the mean displacement values ofx axis and y axis were -0.33 mm. 0.81 mm, respectively and the standard deviations of systematic error were 1.71 mm, 3.08 mm, respectively and the standard deviations of random errors were 1.40 mm. 1.88 mm, respectively. The mean displacement values of z axis and y axis were 2.98 mm. 0.74 mm, respectively and the standard deviations of systematic error were 4.75 mm, 2.65 mm, respectively and standard deviations of random error were 2.69 mm. 1.86 mm, respectively. The statistical difference of field size by using air vacuum cushion between two groups in posterior direction and lateral direction was not shown. CONCLUSION: We think that use of air-vacuum cushion may not be an advantage for improving setup accuracy in rectal cancer patients.